Re: [ga] Re: Last minute changes to Verisign agreements
Dear Board Members,
Any attempt to approve or agree to the new agreement with Verisign is hereby
objected to in full.
At this time we do not object on the substantive issues as we have not had time
to review and respond appropriately.
We do object on the procedural issues of time and manner. Any agreement
entered into in this manner does not have the support of the General Assembly and
should be viewed with distrust.
Members of the General Assembly
Perhaps this is a good start?
"Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" wrote:
> this is the critical point. See also my latest comments at
> On Mon, 2 Apr 2001 email@example.com wrote:
> > Many of us did not bother suggesting improvements because it was said in no
> > uncertain terms none at all would be considered. If stakeholders had known
> > the "non negotiable" agreements were negotiable then quite a different set of
> > feedback may have been provided.
> > There is now no opportunity for the Names Council or any constituency to give
> > meaningful input to the Board as to whether this latest set of changes
> > partially or wholely meets their concerns.
> Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
> A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | firstname.lastname@example.org
> U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
> +1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm
> -->It's warm here.<--
> This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
> Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html