ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga-full]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Voting rules, take 4


Eric and all remaining assembly members,

  This is the best suggestion I hav seen yet.  Nicely done Eric!

Weisberg wrote:

> Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>
> > If we have three proposals, and they get 49/26/25, what should we do?
> > Shall we say that there's no consensus, and therefore we will never have
> >  a voting procedure?
> > Maybe in this case a good model will be to vote separately "Y/N" on each
> >  of the three, and pick the one that has more "Yes" (provided that the
> > "Yes" are above 50%).
> >
> > Fair enough?
>
> Please notice what we are doing.  First, we argue that there is no time to
> discuss and implement the IRV (Instant Run-off Voting) system which address
> such issues (not to mention STV to deal with multi-seat elections).  Then,
> we propose other methods of doing so.  I move that we put all propositions
> up for a vote using IRV and see what happens.
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                          Name: weisberg.vcf
>    weisberg.vcf          Type: VCard (text/x-vcard)
>                      Encoding: 7bit
>                   Description: Card for Weisberg

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 112k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 9236 fwd's to home ph#
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>