[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ga-full] Re: Single Letter Domains
Mr Alvestrand,
A template has been submitted to NSI [NIC-000528.86e3] for the processing
of the K.COM domain. For me to be denied this domain when others have
been accommodated would pose an interesting challenge, in my view. I
expect this domain to be processed promptly, and I have asked Mr. Roberts
to intervene if necessary.
Thank you.
John Kaufman
________________________ Reply Separator ________________________
At 14:52 27.05.2000 -0700, John Kaufman
wrote:
Dear Mr. Roberts, the ICANN Board of
Directors, DNSO, and Other Interested Parties:
This email constitutes an official demand for the sale of
"k.com" to the undersigned without delay. Regardless of what
many at your and your supporting organizations have said to me about the
procedures and policies surrounding the single-letter domain matter, the
entire issue is obviously moot given that precedent has been firmly set
with respect to the registration of four single-letter domains -- in this
case, to four separate and private parties.
Once again, this email constitutes an official demand for the sale of
"k.com" to the undersigned without delay.
Given the evidence that other single-letter domains have been allocated
quite recently in the domains administered by NSI, I now think that the
necessary next step is for NSI to explain their policy of allocation of
these domains, since I do not understand it.
ICANN has (IMHO) no business interfering in single allocations; the
question of who is going to own "k.com" is IMHO not an ICANN
matter.
The question of what policy to follow is (IMHO) a matter where ICANN may
have input.
Harald A
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, EDB Maxware, Norway
Harald.Alvestrand@edb.maxware.no
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html