[ga-full] Re: [ga] ICANN reposesses PN domain for Pitcairn

[Dnsipv6@aol.com]

Harald and everyone else,

  I thought that Jeri Clausing's take was much more accurate than
ICANN's strange report.  A little marketing went into that report!

  Seems like the is all of 49 residents on this little island.  Jeff
Williams ask me to check it out last night for security purposes,
so I did.  It is full of holes.  They are going to get hacked.  Well
I will be sending them some ideas as to how to address those
gaping holes in their systems tomorrow. 

  I hope nobody is stupid enough to register any DN's with them
anytime soon!

  Kinda a cheep looking site I thought as well...

David "Dude" Jenson

In a message dated 2/14/00 4:47:53 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
Harald@Alvestrand.no writes:

<< While we've been working over here, ICANN has taken its first step into
 doing something to the "country code" registry business: Publishing a 
 report recommending that the registry of the "PN" (Pitcairn) domain be 
changed.
 Jeri Clausing's take:
 
 http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/02/biztech/articles/14code.html
 
 IANA's report to ICANN:
 
 http://www.icann.org/general/pn-report-11feb00.htm
 
 It is not clear from ICANN's web page whether the registry change decision 
 has in fact been made, or when it's effective from. I hope those details 
 will be published soon.
 
                 Harald A
  >>
--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html