[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ga-full] Re: [ga] new WG on chartered/sponsored TLDs

To: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
Subject: [ga-full] Re: [ga] new WG on chartered/sponsored TLDs
From: Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 17:03:35 -0800 (PST)
cc: ga@dnso.org, wg-c@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <20000210161432.H19793@songbird.com>
Sender: owner-ga-full@dnso.org

kent,

why don't you contribute to wg-c rather than support a notion of
circumventing it by creating a parrallel working group?

-rick

On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Kent Crispin wrote:

> So yes, I am frustrated with what goes on in WG-C :-)
> 

--
This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Follow-Ups:
- [ga-full] Re: [ga] new WG on chartered/sponsored TLDs
  - From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- [ga-full] Re: [ga] new WG on chartered/sponsored TLDs
  - From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>

References:
- [ga-full] Re: [ga] new WG on chartered/sponsored TLDs
  - From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>

Prev by Date: [ga-full] Re: [ga] Another Resignation - An thank god pigs don't fly
Next by Date: [ga-full] Re: [ga] Registration process suggestion
Prev by thread: [ga-full] Re: [ga] new WG on chartered/sponsored TLDs
Next by thread: [ga-full] Re: [ga] new WG on chartered/sponsored TLDs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread