[ga-abuse] Fwd: Re: [ga] remote participation

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

I understand you have been engaging in a selective enforcement of the
rules lately, and acting in a willy nilly fashion, but perhaps you
might actually see the personal attack in this message and make a
right decision for once.

This is a forwarded message
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
To: Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Date: Saturday, February 17, 2001, 10:17:19 PM
Subject: [ga] remote participation

===8<==============Original message text===============
At 05:38 AM 2/16/2001, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
>I think everyone, including the people physically present, should have to
>submit comments via the 'remote' system and be subject to the same
>filtering.  This will remove the otherwise highly unfair advantage that
>wealth and physical proximity bring to attendees.  If the system of
>handling remove comments is fair enough for remote participants, it should
>be fair enough for physical participants.  If it is not, this system will
>ensure that it quickly reaches that standard.
>
>Anything less is second-class status.


A major purpose of the face-to-face meetings is more efficient exchange.

The technology for remote participation is still quite limited.

So your suggestion is to LIMIT EVERYONE to a less efficient mode?

Thank you, Professor Procrustes, but it would not be a good idea for any of 
us to lie down in that bed...

d/

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

===8<===========End of original message text===========



-- 
Best regards,
 William                            mailto:william@userfriendly.com