[council] (bis) FYI. Board election

[DNSO Secretariat <DNSO.Secretariat@dnso.org>]

Dear Candidats to the ICANN Board,

Please find attached a message posted from the NC Chair,
considering time for election.
You may find it in archives, the first of a serie:
 http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc05/msg00737.html
 http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc05/msg00738.html
 http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc05/msg00739.html
 http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc05/msg00740.html
 http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc05/msg00747.html
 http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc05/msg00749.html

Regards,
DNSO Secretariat
--

> From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
> To: "NC \(list\)" <council@dnso.org>
> Subject: [council] Board election
> Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 12:45:57 +0200
>
>
> NC,
> The current timetable for the election to the board is
>
> 1. Nominations/acceptances close 7 August.
> 2. Endorsements =3 weeks:
> Start: Tuesday 07 August 2001 at 16:00 UTC (18:00 Paris)
> End: Tuesday 28 August 2001 at 16:00 UTC (18:00 Paris) (3 weeks).
> 3. Vote by the NC = 4 days.
> 4. Results to ICANN by 16 September.
>
> Options
> The question arises therefore if we should have the actual election the
> four days following the 28 August (ie Wed 29 - Sat 1 Sep) or vote during
> the first Montevideo week (w/c 3 September or the second Montevideo week >
(w/c 10 September).
>
> Proposal
> Given that people will be either travelling to or from Montevideo and
> that the election may distract the business of the NC during Montevideo,
> I propose we hold the election Wed 29 - Sat 1 Sep). (In reality it is
> unlikely we will need more than two days but we need to schedule four).
>
> I will make this proposal at the Aug 16th meeting but wanted to post it
> now to give all candidates sufficient notice of this timetable.
>
> Philip Sheppard
> NC Chair
>