[wg-review] Babelish English

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Hi! Folks!

I do not identify any English/American//British/North/South language problem.
There is only an absolute veto of mine concening two misconcepts which may 
be result from English wording or culture.

1. the iCANN is not to have, to take, to make, to do, to run, to attempt, 
etc... any decision. iCANN is here to serve consensus. Period. Like a Cisco 
machine does what the protocol expects it to do. Any other model, 
understanding, proposition, policy, preaching,  etc... will only harm the 
image and the strength of the service provided by the iCANN an the network 
stability. IMO iCANN is not a godfather to protect us, it is a Jeeves to 
serve us. Must I write it in French, Spanish or Latin, so it is accepted 
once for all that this is my position IRT the iCANN.

2.  as documented in an earlier post, from observation the most mutually 
ununderstandable word among English/American and the like people is 
obviously the word "constituency". While that word has absolutely no 
meaning outside of that reduced circle.

So, I want it to be clear that I will veto and fight any document, 
proposition, conclusion, suggestion, draft, statement, analysis, etc... 
supporting the idea that iCANN is to be a leader instead of being anything 
else than a follower - and/or the word "constituency".

I hope this signal has been now understood. If anyone you has any problem 
with my English here, please do not hesitate to call on me for more details 
about the fact that "governance" is a French word meaning "net keeping" and 
"constituency" means nothing anywhere except different things only in 
English, American and Icann.

Jefsey

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html