ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] GA 2


On Target!
yes, Mr. Auerbach and Mr. Crispin, and others with concrete data/info for
us. We value you. Mr. Crispin, I was not kidding in an offlist item I sent
you, Glad you are here.

We need to keep the achivable and necessary output of the wg going and keep
the wg relevant and active!
Phil in Butte
On Fri, 02 Feb 2001 15:03:49 -0800, Eric Dierker wrote:

>  
>  
>  Phil King wrote:
>  
>  > Eric, this may have been answered in the day between my reading and
it's
>  > posting.  I see no mystery with the fact that this came up when it did.
>  > This is so far the most successfull slowdown of productive discussion
in
>  > terms of time wasted since I've been on the list (24 Dec).  I don't
know if
>  > it is the specific subject we want to review, GA, or just cut our
output, or
>  > our credibility.  Machs Nicht, there is a little discussion but it's in
the
>  > background, and hard to keep track of.  (and I wax verbose, again!) 
Phil in
>  > Butte!
>  
>  Let me just put it on the table.  There are basically two opposing
reasons for
>  wanting this review to fail.  Squash it and maintain status quo, i.e.
remain in
>  position, or squash it and use it as an example that ICANN cannot
function and
>  must therefore be replaced by........  Either way it is the precious
contracts
>  that are being fought over.
>  Now to bring this on to point.
>  
>  The GA as it is, is window dressing to show compliance with the charge of
>  representing the ICW. If we fix it and make it really work then the two
>  positions related above are in danger.
>  
>  Therefore this may be the most important issue of all, but it can only
occur
>  through the education, communication and outreach which is late on our
list. A
>  review of the June report of the WG on outreach and history to this point
is
>  right on point, that was basically killed by the same technique as this
WG
>  almost was, timing making it irrelevant.
>  
>  This is why I again invite members such as Mr. Crispin and Mr. Auerbach
to
>  continue our tutoring. It is not their positions that are important it is
the
>  existance of the positions, and our knowledge of them. The single most
helpful
>  current mechanism in this regard IMHO is
>  http://www.lextext.com/icann/index.html.
>  
>  If I am on point we surely will know by the response to this post.
>  
>  Sincerely,
>  
>  P.S. Do the still have that downhill course where we actually had to
prejump a
>  road. NCAA Championship '77.
>  


Yo, Felipe (I, Phillip)
Phil King
Butte America
(The Richest Hill On Earth)





_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>