RE: [wg-review] GA 2

["Cindy Merry" <tomerrys@inter-linc.net>]

These are interesting suggestions.  Can you please give me simple
definition of the following?

At Large
General Assembly
Constituency Group

Thanks for your help, Cindy

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On Behalf
Of Eric Dierker
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 5:09 PM
To: review
Subject: [wg-review] GA 2

As a suggestion:

Would it work to use the existing corporate structure to a further
degree?

There would be three classes of stock issued each with corresponding
voting rights.

At large would be one type of stock.
General Assembly would be another type of stock.
And the constituency groups would be another type of stock.

The stock would not be sold but issued in accordance with the membership
provisions as discussed.

Meetings would be held in accordance  with the already existing
structure of the law.

When I asked yesterday who owned the corporation I was met with a
resounding silence.

When the risk of lawsuits was spoken it became clear that we could run
this like a corporation.

Ultimately the problem of having those in a situation to contract as a
vendor to the corporation run the corporation is going to have to be
handled in a way that will cause the least damage.

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html