ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [wg-review] Submission One for Wg-Review, The DNSO Constituencies. - Dassa.


Darryl:

The ccTLD Constituency, of which I am a member, consists of the managers of
244 ccTLDs.

That is all there is.

I can not support your position because my constituency would be dis-allowed
under your rule #1, below.

Peter de Blanc
AdCom
ccTLD constituency
Manager, .VI

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Dassa
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 6:57 AM
To: wg-review@dnso.org
Subject: [wg-review] Submission One for Wg-Review, The DNSO
Constituencies. - Dassa.


Submission One for WG-Review, The DNSO Constituencies
----------------------------------------------------
Darryl (Dassa) Lynch January 2001.

Preamble
--------
The current constituency structure within the DNSO if very rigid and from
all appearances, not truly representative.  There  is continued
dissatisfaction within the Internet community for, and a lack of
understanding of, the DNSO.  The following  submission deals with some
specific aspects of the constituency structure but is not purported to be a
complete solution,  only the basis for a possible start in the right
directions.

Possible Structure
------------------
It is noted the current constituencies within the DNSO have low member
numbers.  As such, the writer does not see them as  being representative.
This is one of the first constituency issue that needs to be addressed.  Nor
are all possible groups  accounted for with the current constituency
structure.  There would appear to be some artificial barriers in place to
limit  true representation.

I propose a reform of the current constituency model to the following:

1.0 The DNSO set a mimimum membership level for any constituency at 500
members.

(snipped)

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>