[wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Discussion
At 04:17 PM 1/26/01, Derek Conant wrote:
>I can understand that certain WG voters may not have contributed comments
>while they monitored the debate process.
>However, 25 voters seems like an excessively high turnout when compared to
>the few WG comment contributing participants.
Since somewhere over 70 people have posted to this group, out of over 200
initial members, I regard it as disappointingly low. The voting rules have
been discussed, voted on, and in effect for weeks now. Going back to
process when we have an actual topic on the table strikes me as a step
So, can we discuss the topic?
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html