DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: I Disagree - Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Discussion

1/26/01 4:54:57 PM, Derek Conant <dconant@dnsga.org> wrote:

>If the WG is going to use votes for its direction, voters should be identified so
>that WG contributing participants know that the votes and voters are legitimate.

***Of course, I don't think anyone is advocating public knowledge of *how* they voted; just *that* they participated 
in the voting.  I don't think this is unreasonable, especially in light of comments which support NC Member 
participation in the WG.  I don't think this is unreasonable in the slightest.

Sotiris Sotiropoulos
          Hermes Network, Inc. 

This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>