Re: I Disagree - Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Discussion
1/26/01 4:54:57 PM, Derek Conant <email@example.com> wrote:
>If the WG is going to use votes for its direction, voters should be identified so
>that WG contributing participants know that the votes and voters are legitimate.
***Of course, I don't think anyone is advocating public knowledge of *how* they voted; just *that* they participated
in the voting. I don't think this is unreasonable, especially in light of comments which support NC Member
participation in the WG. I don't think this is unreasonable in the slightest.
Hermes Network, Inc.
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html