Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Discussion

[Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com>]

At 01:25 PM 1/26/01, Derek Conant wrote:
>Question:  I wonder why the majority of voters appear to want to abandon the
>constituency structure?

We've had over 250 posts to the WG on this topic - perhaps you might want 
to review them :)

>Question:  Who are the 25 voters?
>Question:  Are any of the 25 voters representatives of ICANN/NC or any other
>ICANN policy making body?

I don't know, and don't care. What matters is that they are members of this 
WG, have a right to participate, and have done so.

I find it curious - understandable, but still curious - that there has been 
any focus or question about whether or not NC members should be 
participating in the discussion here. By all means, examine what they write 
and how they respond, it will help you to understand them, but to question 
their participation seems counterproductive to an inclusive process. On the 
one hand, there seems to be concern that the NC aren't taking the WG 
seriously - on the other, concerns expressed when they participate. It 
seems to me it would be rather hard to take the WG seriously and also not 
participate, but perhaps I'm just an idealist.


Regards,
Greg

sidna@feedwriter.com

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html