ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[wg-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] Discussion


Mr. Burton,

Question:  I wonder why the majority of voters appear to want to abandon the
constituency structure?

Question:  Who are the 25 voters?

Question:  Are any of the 25 voters representatives of ICANN/NC or any other
ICANN policy making body?

Derek Conant


Greg Burton wrote:

> On 11:39 AM 1/26/01, Greg Burton said:
> >Topic: Constituencies
> >Discussion Period: January 26 - January 30
> >Thread Prefix: 3. [Constituencies]
>
> Poll results on the question "Abandoning the constituency structure
> altogether" were as follows:
>
> Total number of voters: 25
> Against    8         32%
> For         16         64%
> No Opinion 1       4%.
>
> Due to these results, it appears to me that discussion might focus first on
> the question "If constituencies are to be abandoned altogether, what should
> replace them?"
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> sidna@feedwriter.com
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>