RE: [wg-review] [TELECON] Disappointment.

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

Which Senators are you working with? I am asking this as  US citizen.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Derek Conant [mailto:dconant@dnsga.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 9:00 AM
> To: sotiris@hermesnetwork.com
> Cc: wg-review@dnso.org; cctld-discuss@wwtld.org; dtreaty@dnsga.org;
> subscribers@dnsga.org
> Subject: Re: [wg-review] [TELECON] Disappointment.
> 
> 
> I do not think that the teleconference idea was a bad idea, however, I
> was
> beginning to wonder when someone here would mention disappointment in
> the
> scheduling of the teleconference.  In reviewing the teleconference
> related
> communication, it appeared to me that there was no focus, whatsoever,
> regarding
> the teleconference.
> 
> I was also wondering what the parties here were going to 
> discuss during
> the
> teleconference while subject matters have yet to be worked out through
> the email
> process.
> 
> I suggest that matters be discussed via email until there is an agenda
> and until
> certain subject matters are crystallized.  Then hold a teleconference.
> 
> Let's continue to discuss matters here via email and let's get back to
> business
> here so that I may accurately relay such information to the 
> US Senators
> I am
> working with on proposing reform of DoC policy and ICANN.
> 
> Derek Conant
> 
> 
> Sotiropoulos wrote:
> 
> > I tried getting a line through some of the discount 
> long-distance avenues
> > available.  Net2phone was having server troubles and I 
> couldn't establish an
> > account, 1010620 & 1015945 resulted only in busy signals, 
> and Bell Canada
> > wanted $1.37 /minute to put me through to Singapore. 
> Through the last hour
> > and a half, I have tried to get a reasonably affordable 
> line into the
> > teleconference, without success.  So... I just gave up!
> >
> > To be frank, if I have to absorb long-distance costs to 
> share my ideas with
> > the WG via teleconference, then so much for a "bottom-up" 
> approach.  I
> > think "bottoms-up" is *much* more appropriate.  My 
> participation in the WG-
> > Review has already resulted in some considerable 
> expenditure of my time,
> > resources, and energies.
> >
> > I wish to state, for the record, that I found this entire 
> teleconference
> > *experience* to be quite an ill-conceived, hurried, and 
> badly executed
> > exercise on the whole.  I am seriously disappointed.
> >
> > Sotiris Sotiropoulos
> >           Hermes Network, Inc.
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html