Re: [wg-review] [DNDEF]

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 09:00:00AM -0500, igoldste@mum.neric.org wrote:
> While the Mark holder should have a right to protect it's mark from 
> confusion, I do not feel that it should be given greater rights than 
> anyone else for non-confusing superstrings.

I don't see any conflict with what you say and:

> > Surely what is important is the intent of the domain name holder. Are =
> > they in good faith or bad faith? Do they seek fair DNS presence (that =
> > may be coincidental to the names of others) or do they seek to pretend =
> > to be what they are not?

...which was, I beieve Phil's basic point.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html