Re: [wg-review] no, thank you

[FeedWriter Administration <feedwriter@feedwriter.com>]

On 10:59 PM 1/17/01, Derek Conant said:

 >I believe that existing forum processes have shown to have little impact on
 >ICANN final objectives.

One impact they've clearly had is the existence of this WG. Whether we 
accomplish anything in the "final objective" depends at least in part on 
us. You needn't tell us that the DNSO has serious problems - as a group, we 
know that. What we're trying to do is to not only identify problems, but 
address them within this structure. The better quality work we produce, the 
more compelling reasons something needs changing, the more likely it is for 
a recommendation to be adopted.

There are no guarantees, of course. The only sure thing is that if we 
abandon this process in the middle, any change that comes at all will come 
top-down.

Regards,
Greg


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html