[wg-review] [IDNH] Poll results:How to represent the IDNHolders if there is no constituency structure?

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

http://www.democracy.org.nz/vote1/cfm/results.cfm?TID=190

How to represent the IDNHolders if there is no constituency structure?

Total number of voters: 19

not at all                   3                        15.7895% 
other: please specify 9                         47.3684% 
turn the GA into an electoral college 7   36.8421% 

Comments: 
·       Depends 100% on structure chosen to replace constituencies 
·       This question is invalid without knowing what possible structures may
replace the current model. I prefer a model with small groups, larger in
number
at the bottom level that report up and are represented in higher levels. 
·       through self defined Centers of Interest, SIG, etc.. with NC
representation if approved/yearly confirmed bythe GA 
·       I have requested, on the mailing list, clarification of the
relationship
between the constituencies and the Names Council, and, none has been
forthcoming. I am unable to make an informed vote. 
·       Please refer to my previous comments. 
·       Let the NC stand for election before members of the ICANN@LARGE.
Let the
Commercial Interests, other stakeholder groups, and individuals finance the
campaigns. An eletoral college approach based on ICANN regions, not
constituencies, is preferred. 
·       Premature question. WG should first review various models. 
·       This is a premature question. If we reatin the C structure, then a
should be WG established to tackle this question. 
·       I won't lend my support to any thought that there may be some lesser
acceptable alternative to a fully empowered IDNH constituency (short of
elminating constituencies altogether) 


--Joop--
www.idno.org
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html