<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [wg-review] Bounced Message from AFNIC, Annie
Well. If we do not translate email on lists, and we just translate reports
we are disentrancing non-English speakers. They need to be involved in the
process, not just hear about on the 5 o'clock news. (excuse the sarcasm) .
While I agree it's a daunting task, if ICANN is going to be international
then we need translators for just about everything.
Dr. Gendron
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-review@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-review@dnso.org] On Behalf
Of Robin Miller
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 10:42 AM
To: wg-review@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-review] Bounced Message from AFNIC, Annie
Hmm, I just read a good suggestion from Joel Disini of .PH to let the ccTLDs
do
it... and it could be part of how they 'pay' ICANN. I personally thought it
was an interesting suggestion, so I am restating it in case people didn't
pay
attention...
Corporations with international businesses have translations done all the
time.
Why should ICANN be any different? Now if ICANN is going to be an
'international' corporation, at the very least it should act like a real
one...
Its not like every email message on a mailing list has to be translated,
rather
the official public reports, documents and such... Its really not a daunting
task.
all the best, Robin
Ken Stubbs wrote:
>
> how can anyone disagree with this multilingual concept...
>
> the only problems in accomplishing this are practical ones (I.e. financial
&
> manpower)
>
> unfortunately, I have not seen anyone stepping up with any volunteer
efforts
> to translate key documents into other languages (this includes the
proposals
> & statements from this wg) .
>
> it might have been a very "symbolic" outreach gesture and positive example
> for this group to have "offered" significant output documents in other
> languages but, to date, no person or group has stepped forward to
> volunteer
>
> ken stubbs
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
> To: <wg-review@dnso.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 8:45 AM
> Subject: [wg-review] Bounced Message from AFNIC, Annie
>
> > Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:30:26 +0100
> > From: Annie Renard <Annie.Renard@nic.fr>
> > To: Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM>
> > Cc: Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>,
> > "Oscar A. Robles Garay" <orobles@nic.mx>, Pilar Luque
> > <pluque@nic.es>,
> > yjpark@myepark.com, wg-review@dnso.org, cctld-discuss@wwtld.org
> > Subject: Re: [wg-review] Re: [cctld-discuss] Comments on review of
DNSOby
> Mr
> > Park
> >
> > In your previous mail you wrote:
> >
> > If we put the issue of money aside are we all in agreement that ICANN
must
> > work in a multi-lingual capacity?
> > ...
> >
> > I agree, all the international organizations work in a multi-lingual
> > capacity :
> > UN (6), WIPO (3), EU (11), ...
> >
> > Is ICANN really an international organization ? currently NO.
> >
> > ---
> > Annie Renard [nic@nic.fr]
> > AFNIC/NIC France
> > c/o INRIA domaine de Voluceau BP105, 78153 Le Chesnay CEDEX, France
> > http://www.nic.fr/
> > Personal Email: Annie.Renard@nic.fr
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|