Re: [wg-review] RE: [CONSENSUS] IS A LOADED TERM... / IDNH

[Eric Dierker <ERIC@HI-TEK.COM>]

I am quite certain that I visited this poll and was not required to use any identifiers at all much less a password.  I object to it's inclusion on those
grounds.  I definately object to holding up the report, on grounds already stated by others.

Sotiropoulos wrote:

> I wish to submit the following result from the poll "Domain Name Definition" conducted with the *silent* consent of all participants of the WG-Review, and
> therefore `legally' valid.
>
> As of January, 15, 2000  5:44PM EST, I, Sotiris Sotiropoulos, certify and submit the following result of WG-Review members polled on the question:
>
> "6.  Should DNSO constituencies be retained or abolished altogether?"
>
> The following results are based on the participation of the total of 25 respondents of the poll:
>
> Abolished:    16 Votes = 64.00%
> Retained:      3 Votes  = 12.00%
> Don't Know:  3 Votes  = 12.00%
> Other:            3 Votes  = 12.00%
>
> Considering this result, I move that any recommendations/reports from this WG to the NC (and anyone else) regarding proposed "constituencies" to an
> existing structure (and anyone else) be subject to a MAJORITY decision.
>
> Sotiris Sotiropoulos
>           Hermes Network, Inc.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
begin:vcard 
n:Dierker;Eric
tel;fax:(858) 571-8497
tel;work:(858) 571-8431
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:Eric@Hi-Tek.com
end:vcard