RE: [wg-review] [CONSENSUS] IS A LOADED TERM...

[Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

1/15/01 5:52:56 PM, "Eric" <eric@springbreaktravel.com> wrote:

>I don't think that would be prudent.  

With all due respect, Eric... who ASKED you?

>I would propose that we allow the
>report to be submitted but add an outline describing how we arrived at the
>conclusions we did.  The results form the polls / voting can be included so
>that the board can see exactly how many people were in favor of what.  It
>will also give them a clear example of why it is important to provide future
>wg's with an exact definition.  Didn't we already decide how this WG defined
>consensus?  Perhaps you could include a "minority opinion" if you disagree.
>That does not seem out of order.

I'm trying to determine the MAJORITY OPINION HERE ERIC.

Sotiris Sotiropoulos
          Hermes Network, Inc.



--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html