[wg-review] 11. IDNH

[Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com>]

It seems clear that there is widespread - almost consensus - support for us 
to recommend a constituency of some kind here.

Could Joanna or someone please prepare and post a clean statement of the 
current motion for inclusion of material? I believe that was Chris or 
David's motion and the statement of differences between atlarge and a dnso 
constituency.

Has that motion been seconded? If so, then I'd like Joop to prepare a vote 
on it. I think everyone has had plenty of time to discuss the concept - 
everything else is details of structure and implementation. Perhaps taking 
that discussion to the GA list could involve more affected people, and also 
reduce the volume here.

Regards,
Greg

sidna@feedwriter.com

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html