Re: [wg-review] Clarifications requested from BoD, Staff, NC, TC,Chair prior to co-Chair elections

[Bret Busby <bret@clearsol.iinet.net.au>]

Kent Crispin wrote:
> 

<snip>

> This is obviously true: to see that, consider a criminal justice system
> that was controlled only by those who thought that the criminal justice
> system wronged them.  That would be, in effect, a criminal justice
> system that was controlled by criminals, and, while you could be sure
> that the rights of criminals would be heavily considered, the rights of
> ordinary citizens would not.
> 
> I know that some will have trouble with the above example and will
> misinterpret it, so let me deal with that: what I said above does *not*
> say that those who think they are wronged by the UDRP are criminals, nor
> does it imply that.  And of course, the UDRP is not a criminal justice
> system at all -- it is a way of resolving civil disputes, etc etc.
> 
>

Thank you for the clarification, Kent.

From the above, then, is my understanding correct, that you also believe
that all citizens should get equal say, and, thus, that ownership of
property (in this instance, domain names, trademarks, etc), should not
be a criterion for suffrage?

-- 

Bret Busby

Armadale, West Australia

......................................
"So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the
answer means."
 - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
 - Douglas Adams, 1988 
......................................
--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html