Re: [wg-review] Re Clarification on Deadline

[Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

1/13/01 11:20:11 PM, "YJ Park \(MINC\)" <yjpark@minc.org> wrote:

>Theresa,
...snip...
>That's the part I have had no idea why we had to stick to the strange
>January
>deadline. According to you, it sounds like the Board wants NC to come up
>with its recommendation report or whatever on this issue "ASAP" after
>Yokohama,
>which could not beeen done properly by NC for more than five months without
>any this bottom-up discussion approach.
>That's how this review working group has been authorised to do its
>substantial
>works which they have done with focus and passion trading off their holidays
>due to strangely set its initial deadline or whatever. And you, as Chair of
>Reviw TF,
>has been asking this group to work for less than a month which you have
>realized
>NC could not do with more than five months, which is NOT "right".
...snip...

Amen, Ms. Park.  Good for you!  Good for us!

I wonder what would happen if we all agreed to retract our statements, observations, and discussions?  What if we issued no report?  How would that go 
over?  Their claims to consesnsus would certainly lack any legitimacy then.

Sotiris Sotiropoulos
          Hermes Network, Inc.


--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html