Re: [wg-review] Re: Re Clarification on Deadline

["YJ Park (MINC)" <yjpark@minc.org>]

Karl wrote:

> The DNSO "problem" has been with us for two years, and it is a deep
> problem.  From watching the "debate" it seems that it may take some more
> stirring of the pot before things to start to thicken into something with
> substance.
> 
> > Taking advantage of some board members' involvements with this group,
> > I also want to ask them to clarify what really the Baord wants.
>
> At times deadlines are useful mechanisms to nudge people to agree.  I'm
> not at all sure that this is one of those times... yet.

Thank you for sharing your views on this.

> In my first posting to this WG I
> suggested that we really ought to try to use some formalized procedures -
> formalized rules of procedure.  I again make that suggestion.

I second this suggestion, too.
 
Due to pressed time given by NC, this group has been driven a bit crazy,
without proper formalized procedures.

It will force this group to finalize its own charter finalization which
confirms its own membership structure and voting members and 
non-voting members(such as NC or Board members can be) with
resonable timetable.

Any suggestion on further procedure formalization?

Thanks,
YJ

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html