Re: [wg-review] View from here

[J J Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 22:41 7/01/01 -0500, Sandy Harris wrote:
>Karl Auerbach wrote:
> 
>> 1. My sense is that there is a strong belief that the DNSO is a very sick
>> puppy and needs some serious care.
>
>I share both your sense of this and the belief mentioned.
>
>> Personally I'd like to take a vote on that question.
>
>OK. Using what mechanism?
>
The question will appear in the Polling Booth, together with 2 questions
about "consensus" (do we want to use it , and if yes, what constitutes it)
at the same time when we elect our Chair.

As I would like to use this Polling opportunity when many listmembers will
visit the Booth, please bring up more critical Polling questions.

Such as :
1. Should the DNSO Constituency structure be preserved?
2.If yes, should there be an Individual Domain Name Holder/Owner constituency?

and a really useful one:
3.Please list topics that should be discussed in the WG , and the
listmembers can list their order of preference via the Booth.

Etc.

Time is short. Responses will be important for the initial report and for
further discussion. 



--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html