[wg-review] Ten Topics of Review WG

[Andrew Moulden <Andrew@FoolStop.com>]

On 13:51:32 -0500 Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Ken Stubbs said:
"i STRONGLY BELIEVE that the group is straying way off direction"

Regrettably, though perhaps not for the same reasons, I have to agree. This 
WG's scope has been clearly set out:
http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-review/Arc02/msg00096.html

Specific questions relating to each topic are archived at:
1. [Charter]  http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-review/Arc02/msg00098.html
2. [Outreach and 
DNSO]  http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-review/Arc02/msg00099.html
3. [Constituencies]  http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-review/Arc02/msg00100.html
4. [GA]  http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-review/Arc02/msg00101.html
5. [Working Group]  http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-review/Arc02/msg00102.html
6. [Secretariat]  http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-review/Arc02/msg00103.html
7. [Names Council]  http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-review/Arc02/msg00104.html
8. [WG A, B, C and 
DNSO]  http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-review/Arc02/msg00105.html
9. [DNSO Quality]  http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-review/Arc02/msg00106.html
10. [The Board and 
DNSO]  http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-review/Arc02/msg00107.html

Thus far, we have not considered each of these sets of questions in 
anything even approximating a systematic way, and I propose to the Chair 
that we now organize to do so. Is there a "point of order" system? The 
email list format is unstructured enough without random, unlabelled 
thoughts cluttering our inboxes. At this rate the election process will 
sideline us into complete dysfunctionality.

Andrew Moulden

--
This message was passed to you via the wg-review@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe wg-review" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html