RE: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] questions appearing to have n ear consensus

[Greg Burton <sidna@feedwriter.com>]

At 08:23 PM 12/29/00, Phil King wrote:
>I certainly hope not, too easy for multiple answerers.  But good for getting
>idea of how rough leanings of opinions are.

Exactly :) I'd be the last person to claim this is a secure method for a 
formal vote, since a fairly web-literate person could vote more than once. 
They'd have to work at it a bit, and it's probably not worth it to anyone 
while it's only used for gathering process-related material. A vote with 
something actually riding on the answers would be another matter.


Regards,
Greg

sidna@feedwriter.com