RE: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] questions appearing to have near consensus

["Marsh, Miles (Gene)" <MarshM@diebold.com>]

I was not aware that we were to use the poll as a method to determine consensus.

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Burton
To: wg-review@dnso.org
Sent: 12/29/00 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: [wg-review] 3. [Constituencies] questions appearing to have near consensus

I believe that we have near-consensus on answers to the following
questions.

2. Does the current constituency structure impact the effectiveness of
the 
DNSO and NC?
	yes, negatively (14 agree, 1 disagree, 2 don't know)

5. Does the current process promote the development of overall community

consensus?
	rarely at best (9 no, 6 rarely, 1 sometimes, 1 generally)

6. Are all DNSO interests adequately represented in the existing 
constituency groups?
	no (0 yes,  12 no, 5 suggesting other interests)

9. Are there important parts of the Internet Community that may need
better 
representation?
	yes (12 with suggestions, 3 maybe, 0 no, 2 no answer)

10. Should there be a constituency for individuals?
	yes (15 yes, 1 no, 1 no answer)

12. Should the constituencies be reformulated?
	yes (3 no,  12 yes (differing answers as to how), 2 no answer)

Regards,
Greg
sidna@feedwriter.com