[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-d] Interim measures: second thoughts
> 1) "net.wisdom" is not an authoritative or verifiable source for input
> to this discussion.
moves your email pretty well.
> 2) This is WG-D. Arguments about the substance of WG-C should be
> conducted there.
i was merely responding to jonathan's position. you don't have to like it.
> 3) You've never had any trouble having a position while maintaining
> positions as chair or representative. I'd think twice before
> throwing stones, Randy.
i suggest you substantiate that slur or stick it where the sun don't shine.