Re: [wg-d] GA Definition Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 02:04 PM 11/08/1999 -0400, Bret A. Fausett wrote:

>My perception is that what you're identifying as political dissent in the 
>GA is a result of the fact that the NCDNHC and the IDNO are not yet 
>recognized, the persons who fall into those categories are understandably 
>upset about their lack of recognition, and the only available forum for 
>their participation, at present, is the GA. I assume that these two 
>constituencies will be recognized in Santiago, so perhaps the GA will 
>take on a different character then. 
>

As far as the IDNO constituency is concerned I can confirm the correctness
of this perception, Bret.
However, rejection in Santiago will have an inevitable effect on the makeup
of the new membership.


--Joop Teernstra LL.M.--  , bootstrap  of
the Cyberspace Association,
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
http://www.idno.org