[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-d] GA Definition Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda

To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-d] GA Definition Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
From: "Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 12:19:01 -0700
cc: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>, wg-d@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 11 Aug 1999 12:02:29 PDT." <m11Eddt-0008G5C@rip.psg.com>
Sender: owner-wg-d@dnso.org


On 11 August 1999, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>
>whence comes the assumption that there should be a constituency for any
>class of entity?  should there be a unix admins' constituency?  


There'd better be! <clickety-click>

;)

-- 
Mark C. Langston	     			Let your voice be heard:
mark@bitshift.org				     http://www.idno.org
Systems Admin					    http://www.icann.org
San Jose, CA					     http://www.dnso.org

References:
- Re: [wg-d] GA Definition Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-d] GA Definition Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
Next by Date: Re: [wg-d] Re: [ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-d] GA Definition Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
Next by thread: Re: [wg-d] GA Definition Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread