[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-d] Interim measures: second thoughts



> 1)  "net.wisdom" is not an authoritative or verifiable source for input
>     to this discussion.

moves your email pretty well.

> 2)  This is WG-D.  Arguments about the substance of WG-C should be
>     conducted there.

i was merely responding to jonathan's position.  you don't have to like it.

> 3)  You've never had any trouble having a position while maintaining
>     positions as chair or representative.  I'd think twice before
>     throwing stones, Randy.

i suggest you substantiate that slur or stick it where the sun don't shine.

randy