[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-d] GA Definition Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda

To: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-d] GA Definition Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 11:57:38 -0700
Cc: <wg-d@dnso.org>
References: <199908111803.LAA19696@grebe.prod.itd.earthlink.net><006001bee425$7bc0ac20$7bfe3b9d@redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <m11EdJX-0008G5C@rip.psg.com>
Sender: owner-wg-d@dnso.org

> the ga is not a constituency.  it is where the constituencies meet.

Point understood - so let me put it to you - in your opinion, which
constituency would be the appropriate one for a prospective
registry?

Christopher

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-d] GA Definition Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
- Re: [wg-d] GA Definition Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
  - From: "Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>

References:
- [wg-d] GA Definition Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
  - From: "Bret A. Fausett" <baf@fausett.com>
- Re: [wg-d] GA Definition Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
  - From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
- Re: [wg-d] GA Definition Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-d] GA Definition Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
Next by Date: Re: [wg-d] GA Definition Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-d] GA Definition Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
Next by thread: Re: [wg-d] GA Definition Was: ga] DNSO General Assembly - Revised Agenda
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread