[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Consensus call

To: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
From: Alex Kamantauskas <alexk@tugger.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 09:11:56 -0400 (EDT)
cc: Christopher Ambler <cambler@iodesign.com>, wg-c@dnso.org, Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.net>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20000412163912.william@userfriendly.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org


> On 13-Apr-2000 Christopher Ambler wrote:
>> But please stop trying to rewrite history and put meaning or intention
>> into Postel's actions, when it's clear from his own writings that he felt
>> otherwise.
> 
> I'm not rewriting history, Chris, you and Simon are trying to.  I'm just
> calling you on it.
> 

 Why don't you guys call each other on it via private email?  You're
 bringing the S/N ratio up to INEG levels.  

-- 
Alex Kamantauskas
alexk@tugger.net

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
  - From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
Next by Date: [wg-c] I agree with Shuckman
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Consensus call
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread