Re: [wg-c] Consensus call

[Simon Higgs <simon@higgs.net>]

At 03:50 PM 4/12/00 -0700, William X. Walsh wrote:

The farce continues. I vote "yes" and get attacked for it. Sheesh...

> > Item 1: Yes (with the reservation that nothing tangible has yet been
> > officially proposed by ICANN, only the pre-existing RFC1591 submissions)
>
>Those are really "Jon Postel" submissions (which even he later 
>disclaimed), and
>have no relevance to this process or to ICANN, thank you.

Document your false claims - if you can - or stop wasting everyone's 
bandwidth. Or just read this letter and notice the National Science 
Foundation's official position regarding RFC1591 and new TLDs:

http://name.space.xs2.net/law/answers/letters/NSF-NSI08111997.jpg
"The Foundation [NSF] and NSI agreed that new TLDs would be added only in 
accordance with Request For Comments 1591."

The evidence is overwhelmingly against you.


Best Regards,

Simon

--
DNS is not a sacred cow that cannot be replaced by something better.