Re: [wg-c] Administrivia

[Eric Brunner <brunner@world.std.com>]

James Love asked:
1. what the column headers of my administrivia mailings indicate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
name                    | paper | 8 Dec | CAIRO | March | April |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
a person's name
			which position paper (see the Intrim Report) co-signed
				vote on 6-10 (prior consensus call omitted)
					"NEW" if post-CAIRO joinee
						vote on 6-10 and some
							vote on 6-10 and some
e.g.,
Eric Brunner	        | A,D,E	| yes	|	| YES	| Y.N.N	| 
I co-signed A (later retracted, compromise with the hunger-crazed for-profit 
loony-wing is simply too much of a bother to pursue in the first round), D,
and (co-authored) E. I voted for 6-10 in all three of its ballot questions,
and against Philip Sheppard's little parade-to-oblivion, and against an i18n
question (code sets for DNS labels) adding to the core issues for wg-c to
resolve.

To obtain the text of the directions to position paper authors, or to obtain
the text of the ballot question for each of the 8 Dec or March questions, go
to the archives.

2. is this some type of measure of when people joined wg-c or something?
Yes. ("or something" is awfully forgiving)

3. is there a rooster of wg-c membership with details like this somewhere?
No. Hence my contribution which everyone is free to correct or ignore.

Cheers,
Eric