[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT



Even better. My personal opinion is that this is all going
much too far, and the overreach shall be its undoing. But
that's just my opinion - I'm keen to wait and see.

--
Christopher Ambler
chris@the.web


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-c@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-c@dnso.org]On Behalf Of Dave
Crocker
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 12:07 AM
To: wg-c@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT


At 07:58 AM 4/12/00 +0200, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>At 13:52 11.04.2000 -0700, Christopher Ambler wrote:
>>ICANN's very own mandate says that they oversee TECHNICAL COORDINATION of
>>the Internet.
>>How do you justify this?
>Technical coordination has to have policies too.

indeed.

And a small nitpick with the original note:

         ICANN's scope is a very small set of three coordination
activities.  It has taken on -- and been assigned -- nothing as extensive
or ambitious as (all) technical coordination of the (entire) Internet.

         It sounds quite dramatic to overstate ICANN's scope, but it is not
accurate.

d/

=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker  <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg Consulting  <www.brandenburg.com>
Tel: +1.408.246.8253,  Fax: +1.408.273.6464
675 Spruce Drive,  Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA