[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT

To: "Jonathan Weinberg" <weinberg@mail.msen.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2000 10:25:40 -0700
Cc: <wg-c@dnso.org>
References: <3.0.3.32.20000411112918.02f92368@msen.com> <38F36053.C7F0B252@cptech.org>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

> > PROPOSED ROUGH CONSENSUS ITEM NUMBER ONE
 
YES
 
> > PROPOSED ROUGH CONSENSUS ITEM NUMBER TWO

YES

> > PROPOSED ROUGH CONSENSUS ITEM NUMBER THREE

NO. This is policy, not technical management, by any means. 

Christopher

References:
- [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
  - From: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>
- Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
  - From: James Love <love@cptech.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread