[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-c] S/K principles
When I raised the issue Philip claimed competition with .com was simply
not possible. Mind, his offer of proof was assertion. If he's turned on
the issue, fine, if he hasn't ... that's a problem for people who find
some sense of accomplishment or comfort in S/K, at least for those who
are so inclined and attempting to find some mechanism to competition with
the current monopoly.
Next I suggest you do Philip the considerable kindness of pushing him
out the closest available window. Your final attempt at the restatement
of S/K came close to being comprehensible, and Philip's sojourn away has
not improved his comprehensibility or given him the modest wisdom to be
grateful for the assistence you've provided.
If he hadn't popped back like a discarded bait frog from the dark pond of
WG-B, I'd have applied your last rendition of S/K to NAA and explained how
close to something useful I thought you'd got. However, he's running the S/K
show, so it would only annoy him and confuse everyone to address "W/K".
I'm sorry there is so little time, and so much of it has been spent so very
badly, but seriously, as an opponent of S/K, the best version of it I've yet
seen was _not_ written by Philip.