[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently not

To: Eric Brunner <brunner@world.std.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently not
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2000 22:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org, Andrew Dalgleish <andrewd@axonet.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <200004030445.AAA22262@world.std.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 03-Apr-2000 Eric Brunner wrote:
>  This WG appears to be in terminal thrash, erratically bumping from old noise
>  to newcommer nonsense, in a race to discredit its best work before it can be
>  discarded by its intended recipients.

For once, myself and Mr Brunner agree.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE46CoQ8zLmV94Pz+IRAiZtAKCCLZrVZR5STZ/r5rou1yEWYZK6KgCgmK7+
ukjXyebOJBHfNzy+hddhq4o=
=Ctg0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently not i n 10-23 report
  - From: Eric Brunner <brunner@world.std.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently not i n 10-23 report
Next by Date: Re: [RE: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently not i n 10-23 report
Next by thread: Re: [Re: [RE: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread