[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[wg-c] Working Group C agenda

To: wgc <wg-c@dnso.org>
Subject: [wg-c] Working Group C agenda
From: James Love <love@cptech.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 21:35:57 -0500
Organization: http://www.cptech.org
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

At this point, what is Working Group C trying to achieve?  

What are the issues that Working Group C is expected to address?


If Working Group C fails to make progress on the details of how new TLDs
get created, what happens?  Nothing?

Jamie



=======================================================
James Love, Director           | http://www.cptech.org
Consumer Project on Technology | mailto:love@cptech.org 
P.O. Box 19367                 | voice: 1.202.387.8030
Washington, DC 20036           | fax:   1.202.234.5176
=======================================================

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-c] Working Group C agenda
  - From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
- Re: [wg-c] Working Group C agenda
  - From: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Working Group C agenda
Prev by thread: [wg-c] hypothetical registry application
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Working Group C agenda
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread