[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] IPv6

To: "Karl Auerbach" <karl@CaveBear.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] IPv6
From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 14:28:45 -0800
Cc: <wg-c@dnso.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0003211341520.27484-100000@npax.cavebear.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

> But to set one thing straight: IPv6 does have enough address space to
> enumerate every electron in the universe.  

You absolutely sure about that?

--
Christopher Ambler
chris@the.web

References:
- Re: [wg-c] IPv6
  - From: Karl Auerbach <karl@CaveBear.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] IPv6
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently not in 10-23 report
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] IPv6
Next by thread: [wg-c] non-commercial TLDS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread