[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Ambler/Meuller/Walsh/Meyers on .NAA



My comment was that I felt it unfair to give one ethnic group priority
over another. Nothing near being against a domain for yours (or any)
ethnic group. 

The summary is yours, and as such, is your opinion. I don't agree
with it. Indeed, you seem to have drawn conclusions out of a hat.

Indeed, the final message you quote summarizes my position
nicely - I think ALL ethnic groups should get TLDs, not just
"yours." That doesn't mean that "yours" should not. If anything,
YOU are the one being ethnocentric - I would think that you
would champion TLDs for all ethnic groups.

I think you owe me an apology.

--
Christopher Ambler
chris@the.web

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eric Brunner" <brunner@world.std.com>
To: <wg-c@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 9:01 AM
Subject: [wg-c] Ambler/Meuller/Walsh/Meyers on .NAA


> 
> Since there seems to be some selective memory issues, and people new to
> the list wouldn't know where to look, a few of WG-C's less elevating bits
> of enlightened self-interest:
> 
> IODesigns (Ambler) vs .NAA
> http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Arc00/msg01959.html
> No geographic or ethnic charters progress until all geographic or ethic
> charters progress together.
> http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Arc00/msg01988.html
> Subsequent correspondence summarized, and
> http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Arc00/msg01979.html