Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 20-Mar-2000 Dave Crocker wrote:
> At 07:48 PM 3/19/00 -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
>>On 20-Mar-2000 Dave Crocker wrote:
>> > <http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-iab-unique-dns-root-00.txt>
>>
>>Nice try, but please, try again.   This only deals with an IAB position on
>>the
>>existance of multiple root server networks and their use.
> 
> 
>  From the I-D:
> 
>>2.1.  Maintenance of a Common Symbol Set
> ...
>>    Since the DNS is hierarchically structured into domains, the
>>    uniqueness requirement for DNS names in their entirety implies that
>>    each of the names (sub-domains) defined within a domain has a unique
>>    meaning (i.e.  set of DNS records) within that domain.  This is as
>>    true for the root domain as for any other DNS domain.  The
>>    requirement for uniqueness within a domain further implies that there
>>    be some mechanism to prevent name conflicts within a domain.  In DNS
>>    this is accomplished by assigning a single owner or maintainer to
>>    every domain, including the root domain, who is responsible for...
> 
> There's more relevant text, but the above should suffice.
> 

How about a straight answer, Dave. How does this apply to the discussion of the
shared/non-shared registry subject?  I see nothing in that paragraph or
ANYWHERE else in the document that has any relevance at all.

I think you are trying to pull something out of the hat that just isn't there.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE41aRq8zLmV94Pz+IRApWKAJ9kWcidY2YjzaQLyxx/1iR4BQckaQCg6TXd
dlaUHq8WT7G3pUXzylRHfNk=
=XZHu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----