[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] application documents requirements

To: Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] application documents requirements
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 14:22:51 -0800 (PST)
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org, Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003180816350.17095-100000@loki.ar.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 18-Mar-2000 Rick H Wesson wrote:
> we are discussing the addition of GENERIC TLDs and I don't understand the 
> benifit of having additional non-shaired registrings running generic TLDs

Have you read the FTC export report?   

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE41AG78zLmV94Pz+IRAsTnAJ9ymgor8p1vRrHC4uAAPprVxDpZAQCgl2BX
r763U0uzwe1/Q1etOWn0ETQ=
=uoX0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: [wg-c] application documents requirements
  - From: Rick H Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>

Prev by Date: [wg-c] Progress
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Progress
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] application documents requirements
Next by thread: RE: [wg-c] Exclusions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread