[wg-c] reposted for Bob Broxton

[Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>]

>Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 22:37:23 -0500
>From: bob broxton <bob@cavtel.net>
>To: wg-c@dnso.org
>Subject: Report of WG-C
>
>I recommend the following changes to the Report:
>
>1.  Add the following sentence between the second and third sentences
>under "Procedural and outreach history":
>
>"The Working Group is open to anyone who requests to join - there is no
>criteria for joining the group."
>
>2.  Change the last six words in the third sentence under "Procedural
>and outreach history" from "not all of whom are active" to "most of whom
>are inactive".
>
>3.   Delete the last sentence in the third paragraph under "Arguments
>supporting the consensus position" which states:  "Those businesses will
>have to compete based on price, quality and service, rather than on the
>happenstance of which company locked up the most desirable domain name
>first".  If a company cannot compete on "price, quality and service",
>having the "most desirable domain name first"  will not enable the
>company to survive.
>
>4.  In the last sentence under "Conclusion",  delete the fourth word
>"substantial".  "Substantial sentiment" is not shown when only thirteen
>yes "votes" were received, and some of these votes were qualified.
>
>Thank you for the opportunity to submit these comments.
>
>Bob Broxton
>Broxton@erols.com
>
>
>
>