RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p

["Roeland M. J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

So, on the one hand, Postel I and II werent sanctioned but IAHC efforts
were? Aren't you trying to have it both ways here?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-c@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-c@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Dave
> Crocker
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 9:21 PM
> To: wg-c@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman
> "p
>
>
> At 08:49 PM 3/15/00 -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
> >Please, Dave, show me where IANA has this authority, and
> where the NSF
> >specifically delegated it to them.  Let's deal with facts,
> Dave.  When you can
>
> Facts are good.  Please let's DO pay attention to them.
>
> 1.  10 years of operational history is quite a bit of "fact"
>
> 2.  The reference to NSF suggests a pretty thoroughly
> deficient model of
> how things happened, back then, and by whom.  IANA, its
> authority, and its
> funding pre-date major NSF involvement in the Internet.
>
> d/
>
> =-=-=-=-=
> Dave Crocker  <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
> Brandenburg Consulting  <www.brandenburg.com>
> Tel: +1.408.246.8253,  Fax: +1.408.273.6464
> 675 Spruce Drive,  Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA
>