[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names

To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names
From: Eric Brunner <brunner@world.std.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 11:30:18 -0500
cc: wg-c@dnso.org, brunner@world.std.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 24 Feb 2000 11:58:42 EST." <00f101bf7eb6$4dc0eca0$6501a8c0@pc01.aim.be>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org


Sigh. Cutting to what I comprehend from this ...


> 2. You make a lot of play of two national opinions (the White and USDoC
> papers). These are of course relevant vis a vis ICANN but we should be

Let me know when you've an alternate authoritative source for alterations
to the DNS root at the a server.

...

> 4. You reject the differentiation principle as you believe this would
> prevent "direct competition" with .com.  Effective competition with .com
> will not be achieved with .com2.

Expand (one time only please) on the provability of your assertion that
sufficiently effective competition cannot be mounted against .COM.

...

Cheers,
Eric

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names
  - From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names
  - From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] Our mission
Next by Date: [wg-c] straw poll update, possible consensus calls, and our mission
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names
Next by thread: RE: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread